iRacing retained us to represent it in an arbitration action against its former website designer, Keene Systems, Inc. ("KSI"). iRacing previously hired KSI to design a complex website upon which users could participate in and schedule racing simulations online. After several months of unsuccessful tests and demonstrations by KSI, and receiving bills from KSI in nearly triple the amount of the initially quoted estimate, iRacing terminated the consulting agreement for cause. KSI brought an arbitration action against iRacing for refusal to render payment for certain bills, and iRacing counterclaimed for KSI's breach of contract due to project mismanagement. After a full arbitration trial, the Tribunal entered judgment for iRacing on its Counterclaim. Keene Sys., Inc. v. iRacing Motorsport Simulations, LLC, No. 11-117-00854-06 (Am. Arb. Assoc. Apr. 5, 2007). Thereafter, KSI appealed the ruling by way of a motion to vacate/amend in Massachusetts Superior Court, and after another full briefing and hearing, the Superior Court denied the appeal and entered judgment for iRacing.  Keene Sys., Inc. v. iRacing Motorsport Simulations. LLC, No. 07-1936 (Mass. Super. Ct. Nov. 13, 2007). Following the entry of judgment, the principals of KSI attempted to re-incorporate under a different name, presumably to avoid paying the judgment, which we discovered and ultimately forced a favorable settlement.